<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Experiment with Eclipse: 15 Minutes with... Podcast]]></title><description><![CDATA[15 Minutes With is a podcast exploring how brands translate great customer experiences into the digital sphere, featuring short, sharp conversations with industry leaders. It's aimed at business professionals and marketers looking for actionable insights on data-driven decision-making and digital brand experience.]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/s/15-minutes-with-podcast</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:28:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[experimentwitheclipse@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[experimentwitheclipse@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[experimentwitheclipse@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[experimentwitheclipse@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[Disability is not a minority issue.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Why inclusive design benefits everyone &#8212; and what businesses are getting wrong]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/disability-is-not-a-minority-issue</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/disability-is-not-a-minority-issue</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:07:54 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195291921/8b11a8e1322c3e268674b73c49fac74c.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One billion people live with some form of disability. Add temporary and situational limitations &#8212; a broken hand, a pushchair, arms full of shopping bags &#8212; and the number of people who benefit from inclusive design at any given moment is far larger than most businesses assume.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Aya Jibreel, lead inclusion consultant for disability at the United Nations for the MENA region and the Gulf Cooperation Council. Aya&#8217;s work sits at the intersection of design, technology, law, and culture &#8212; and her perspective is both eye-opening and immediately practical.</p><p>The conversation covers why businesses treat accessibility as an afterthought, what that costs them, and why retrofitting accessibility after the fact is far more expensive than building it in from the start. Aya is clear on this: if you thought about accessibility while designing your building, the cost is almost zero. If you retrofit it afterwards, it&#8217;s substantial.</p><p>What makes this episode particularly useful is the cultural dimension. Aya explains why a universal standard like WCAG doesn&#8217;t mean a universal solution &#8212; and why local context, infrastructure, and user needs have to be understood before you design anything.</p><p>Worth 18 minutes of your time if you work in product, design, digital, or any customer-facing role.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[What does a circular economy actually look like?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Inside Lush's Green Hub &#8212; and why transparency is the only honest sustainability strategy]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/what-does-a-circular-economy-actually</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/what-does-a-circular-economy-actually</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:07:46 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195286445/3c2dfa804d744ab461460dafe0cc9db0.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most brands talk about sustainability. Lush built a building for it.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham visit the ideas behind Lush&#8217;s Green Hub &#8212; the physical nerve centre of their circular economy operation &#8212; with Eloise Flinter, Business Development Manager for the Green Hub. Lush has been doing things differently since the 1980s, when their founders invented the solid shampoo bar to eliminate packaging entirely. Nearly four decades later, they&#8217;ve doubled down with a 2.3 million pound investment in a facility that repurposes, repairs, reuses, and recycles &#8212; and has opened it to the public.</p><p>What makes this conversation worth your time isn&#8217;t just the Lush story. It&#8217;s the principles underneath it: that transparency beats statements, that the customer has the right to ask where their products come from, and that inviting people to see what you actually do is more powerful than any marketing campaign.</p><p>The bring-it-back scheme &#8212; where customers return packaging for 50p off their next purchase &#8212; is a clean example of closing the loop between brand promise and brand behaviour. The decision to leave social media platforms until they can demonstrate they protect their users is another.</p><p>Worth 18 minutes if you&#8217;re thinking seriously about how sustainability connects to customer experience and brand loyalty.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Equality is giving everyone a box. Equity is giving the shortest person two.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Nick Howe from NatWest on supporting underrepresented groups, the difference between equality and equity, and what every aspiring founder should know]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/equality-is-giving-everyone-a-box</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/equality-is-giving-everyone-a-box</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:29:05 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195286289/58be2baabc182a746def9bdb3ecd8acd.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Howe has spent nearly 25 years working with businesses &#8212; and the clearest thing he&#8217;ll tell you is that the system doesn&#8217;t start everyone from the same line. His work at NatWest focuses on identifying and supporting underrepresented communities: women in business, ethnic minority founders, young entrepreneurs, and those launching social enterprises.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Nick about what that work actually looks like, what he&#8217;s learned from thousands of conversations with founders, and what the difference between equity and equality means in practice. His fence analogy is the clearest version of that distinction we&#8217;ve heard.</p><p>He&#8217;s also refreshingly direct about the mistakes well-meaning organisations make when they try to support underrepresented groups. The biggest one: arriving with assumptions about what those groups need, rather than listening first. His advice &#8212; shut up and listen &#8212; sounds simple. It&#8217;s harder to consistently do than most people realise.</p><p>His tips for aspiring founders are grounded in the same principle: don&#8217;t fall in love with your solution, fall in love with your customer&#8217;s problem. Validate before you plan. Test before you scale. Get comfortable being uncomfortable &#8212; it&#8217;s not a temporary phase of starting a business, it&#8217;s the job.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you work in inclusion, work with founders, or are thinking about starting something yourself.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Every pound you spend has the power to change the world.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Shivika Sinha on conscious consumerism, the ripple effect, and why purpose is becoming inseparable from profit]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/every-pound-you-spend-has-the-power</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/every-pound-you-spend-has-the-power</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:08:56 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195283977/8573770d514c7f020fe0c3afad40c7d7.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shivika Sinha grew up in Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Vietnam, and Bangladesh &#8212; with a front-row seat to what impact investing can do for the poorest communities in the world. A decade into a marketing career with brands like Oscar de la Renta and Gap Inc., she made a decision. The work she was doing wasn&#8217;t supporting the things she&#8217;d seen growing up. So she pivoted.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Shivika, founder and CEO of Veneka &#8212; a capsule wardrobe styling service built around sustainable, ethical, and cruelty-free brands. She was recognised by Forbes Next 1000, honoured by the UN&#8217;s Decade of Women, and is a TEDx speaker. She also talks like someone who has genuinely thought through the problem, not just the positioning.</p><p>Her chocolate analogy for the ripple effect is simple and sticks: if you switch to Fairtrade chocolate and influence five people, and they each influence five people, your individual purchasing decision compounds through generations. The point isn&#8217;t guilt. It&#8217;s that individual choices have more structural impact than most people give them credit for.</p><p>Her challenge to Western consumerism is harder to hear but worth sitting with. We have, as a society, tied status to stuff. We buy things to say something about ourselves. Unpicking that is inner work as much as it is commercial behaviour. Shivika doesn&#8217;t moralise about it &#8212; she just names it clearly.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes if you&#8217;re a consumer (which is all of us), or a brand trying to understand where purpose-led business is actually heading.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Customer service is not customer experience.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Praval Singh from Zoho on why CX is a practice, not a product &#8212; and what the single source of truth actually means]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/customer-service-is-not-customer</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/customer-service-is-not-customer</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:08:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195283293/aa285a7c1cb35a3a24e4c1b58a701f4b.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When most businesses think about customer experience, they think about customer support. Praval Singh, VP of Marketing and Customer Experience at Zoho, opens the episode by drawing a clear line between the two &#8212; and explaining why conflating them is one of the most common and costly mistakes a business can make.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Praval about how CX touches every stage of the customer lifecycle, why silos between sales, marketing, and service are the enemy of a good experience, and what the practical path from spreadsheet to CRM actually looks like for a growing business.</p><p>His point about employee experience is one worth sitting with. Good CX is delivered by engaged employees who have access to the right information about customers, can see the full picture, and are empowered to act on it. Siloed teams with fragmented data can&#8217;t do that. It&#8217;s not a philosophy problem, it&#8217;s an information architecture problem.</p><p>The conversation is unusually grounded for a topic that often veers into abstraction. Praval&#8217;s advice about what small businesses actually need &#8212; not an enterprise platform, but a tool that works out of the box, onboards in weeks, and provides that single source of truth &#8212; is practical and applicable.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you&#8217;re responsible for customer experience, CRM, or any part of how your business acquires and retains customers.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The true cost of cheap.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Madison Kranis from Fenwick on conscious consumerism, supply chain exploitation, and why traceability and transparency are not the same thing]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/the-true-cost-of-cheap</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/the-true-cost-of-cheap</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:53:29 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195282566/699f2847d76b73322e6fc3a52c14b968.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you buy a five-pound t-shirt, the cost doesn&#8217;t disappear. It gets redistributed &#8212; to the factory workers who can&#8217;t afford to leave, to the children who enter the supply chain because their parents couldn&#8217;t read the contracts they signed, to the rivers running with dye in regions with no alternative water source.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Madison Kranis, Social Impact Expert from the Department of Corporate Responsibility at Fenwick. Madison&#8217;s background is in human trafficking research, and she came to responsible business through the very hard end of what irresponsible supply chains produce.</p><p>Her distinction between traceability and transparency is one of the most clarifying things in the episode. Traceability is knowing where your product comes from. Transparency is choosing to share that publicly. You can have one without the other, and consumers increasingly know how to tell the difference.</p><p>The materiality assessment she recommends is practical: pick three things your business can actually change, own them fully, and do them well. That targeted approach creates real change and credible narrative, rather than the paralysis that comes from trying to address everything at once.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you buy anything, make anything, or sell anything.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Faster payments mean faster fraud.]]></title><description><![CDATA[The payments expert's guide to getting the checkout experience right &#8212; without opening the door to risk]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/faster-payments-mean-faster-fraud</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/faster-payments-mean-faster-fraud</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:48:16 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195281951/ba205fad1d0f2ce17efdfdaf42ccaf9b.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty years ago, a bank transfer took three days. Today it&#8217;s instant. That shift has fundamentally changed what customers expect &#8212; and what criminals can do.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Imran Ali, Director of Payments at KPMG and co-author of the Paytech Book. Imran has spent two decades working with the world&#8217;s largest banks and has a rare ability to make the history and future of payments both clear and genuinely interesting.</p><p>This isn&#8217;t just a technical episode. The conversation covers what fast, seamless payments are doing to spending behaviour &#8212; the buy now, pay later debt spiral, the psychological difference between tapping a phone and counting out cash, and why a healthy amount of friction might actually be good for customers. It also covers what businesses consistently get wrong: treating payments as an afterthought at the end of a beautifully designed purchase journey, and then losing customers at the checkout.</p><p>Imran&#8217;s practical advice is simple and immediately applicable. Think about your payment process as part of the whole experience. Offer choice. Look at open banking and account-to-account payments as a growing alternative to card details. Know your customer.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you&#8217;re responsible for ecommerce, checkout design, or customer experience.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is sustainability good for business?]]></title><description><![CDATA[The surprising commercial case for going green &#8212; and how to avoid the greenwashing trap]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/is-sustainability-good-for-business</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/is-sustainability-good-for-business</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 20:01:07 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195277805/e381caf3a5cf3fa45ad662b8a557f8aa.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sustainability is often framed as an ethical choice. Andrew Griffiths makes the case that it&#8217;s also a commercial one &#8212; and that the two are more closely linked than most businesses realise.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham talk to Andrew, Director of Policy and Partnerships at Planet Mark, about what good sustainability practice actually looks like from the inside. Planet Mark works with over 700 member organisations helping them measure, reduce and report their carbon footprints. Andrew chairs the Institute of Directors National Sustainability Taskforce and is a TEDx speaker.</p><p>What emerges from the conversation is a practical framework for getting started &#8212; and a clear argument for why businesses that treat sustainability like a strategic discipline, rather than a PR exercise, consistently outperform those that don&#8217;t. The Unilever example he cites is striking: purpose-driven brands in their portfolio outperformed non-purpose-driven brands on profitability, growth, and pandemic resilience.</p><p>The greenwashing section is equally useful. Andrew&#8217;s three-step approach to communicating your sustainability journey transparently &#8212; show your working, frame it as a journey not an endpoint, and point to your own Achilles heel &#8212; is advice that applies well beyond carbon reporting.</p><p>Worth 18 minutes of your time if you&#8217;re in any way responsible for how your business presents itself, or where it&#8217;s heading.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Brand isn't what you say it is. It's what your customers say it is.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Laurel Mintz on building brands that stand the test of time &#8212; and why the feedback loop is your most underused tool]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/brand-isnt-what-you-say-it-is-its</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/brand-isnt-what-you-say-it-is-its</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:38:31 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195275160/1da5b7e868bd4a288dba09c962650351.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Branding is not marketing. Marketing is not advertising. And authenticity is not a mission statement on a website. Laurel Mintz makes these distinctions clearly and quickly &#8212; and then gets into the practical mechanics of building brands that actually resonate.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Laurel, CEO and Founder of award-winning LA-based marketing agency Elevate My Brand. She&#8217;s also a podcast host, board member, mentor, and someone who has seen how easily brands lose sight of their customers in the pursuit of their own ideas.</p><p>Her word vomit exercise &#8212; listing everything you want your brand to be associated with, followed by everything you definitely don&#8217;t want it to be &#8212; is a useful starting point for any team trying to find clarity. So is her point about the customer feedback loop: using a survey not just for insight, but as a sell-through opportunity by attaching a small discount to completion.</p><p>The most important thing she says, though, is about myopia. Brands that focus only on their own narrative, without tracking what their competitors are doing and what their customers actually believe about them, are building on sand. The data, she argues, should constantly be testing whether who you think you are matches who your customers think you are.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you work in brand, marketing, or customer experience.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Values aren't a marketing strategy. They're a decision-making framework.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Vineeta Anuj from Mindful Chef on scaling a subscription business, retaining customers through chaos, and why knowing your actual customer changes everything]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/values-arent-a-marketing-strategy</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/values-arent-a-marketing-strategy</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:16:16 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195273860/b80c8beeb27cce11eae53f94e0720803.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mindful Chef started in 2015 with three founders from the south coast who wanted to bring high-quality, local ingredients to the masses. By the peak of COVID, they were on-boarding over 100,000 new customers in a single year and scaling from 15,000 to over 50,000 weekly deliveries almost overnight. The customer experience had to hold through all of it.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Vineeta Anuj, Head of Customer at Mindful Chef, about how the business navigated that growth &#8212; and what values-led decision making actually looks like when you&#8217;re trying to source fresh, just-in-time ingredients at triple the usual volume.</p><p>The research insight she shares about their actual customer is one of the most practically useful moments in the episode. The founders assumed their audience was a fit 25-year-old male. It turned out to be a woman in her fifties &#8212; a pragmatic parent managing fussy teenage diets and complex household health needs. Once you know who you&#8217;re actually serving, every product, recipe, and service decision becomes clearer.</p><p>Her concept of moments of truth &#8212; the five specific things Mindful Chef customers said mattered most &#8212; is a clean model for any subscription or recurring delivery business. Delivery on time. Ingredients correct and quality. Recipe tastes good. Easy to contact when something goes wrong. Easy to use the app. Those are the things measured every week at leadership level.</p><p>Worth 18 minutes if you run or work in a subscription business, manage customer experience at scale, or are trying to navigate growth without losing your brand&#8217;s soul.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[A following is not a community. Here's the difference.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Lucy Hall from Meta and Digital Women on building communities that have a life of their own]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/a-following-is-not-a-community-heres</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/a-following-is-not-a-community-heres</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 19:02:32 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195272897/da1d336c6b2339ae5ca112e84b579e12.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most brands have audiences. Very few have communities. Lucy Hall, lead trainer at Meta and founder of the Digital Women community of 70,000 women, makes the distinction clearly &#8212; and explains why it matters more than most businesses realise.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Lucy about what genuine community looks like, how brands can enter one without being seen as just monetising it, and what it actually takes to keep a community alive and growing. The Red Bull example is well chosen: they don&#8217;t sell energy drink in their community spaces &#8212; they build experiences around sport and energy, and the brand association follows.</p><p>Lucy&#8217;s point about brands and influencers is worth pausing on. Most brand-influencer relationships are transactional: here&#8217;s a product, promote it to your audience. The smarter move, she argues, is to work with community leaders to create genuine educational or experiential value. People end up loving the brand not because they were sold to, but because the brand made their community better.</p><p>The section on moderators is also practical and honest. The best moderators are your most active members &#8212; they&#8217;re already policing the community and building trust within it. Give them a title, a framework, and a little recognition. You probably don&#8217;t need to pay them.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you&#8217;re building a brand community, managing one, or thinking about whether you need one at all.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The marketplace is not the future of ecommerce. It's the present.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Tony Preedy from Fruugo on search-driven shopping, atomic purchasing, and why adding a marketplace channel is lower risk than most businesses think]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/the-marketplace-is-not-the-future</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/the-marketplace-is-not-the-future</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:36:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195270196/f27b37a5dcd23659459c8f15a1b6fe5b.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shift from browsing to searching has quietly changed everything about how people shop online. Consumers no longer seek out a retailer and explore their range. They have a need, they search for it, and they buy from wherever the best result comes from &#8212; increasingly indifferent to which brand or retailer that is.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Tony Preedy, Managing Director of Fruugo &#8212; a global marketplace operating in 42 countries, 31 currencies, and 28 languages, with over 1,800 retailers and 240 million site visits in 2021. Tony has spent his career in ecommerce, and his analysis of where consumer behaviour is heading is both clear and grounded.</p><p>His concept of atomic shopping &#8212; buying the smallest possible unit that satisfies a need, then searching again when the next need arises &#8212; reframes how businesses should think about basket size, loyalty, and channel strategy. The old model of minimum order values and basket building hasn&#8217;t disappeared, but the dominant consumer behaviour has moved well beyond it.</p><p>The practical advice is direct: get your own house in order first, then add marketplace as an incremental channel. The data work to integrate is a one-off project. After that, you&#8217;re accessing footfall you couldn&#8217;t reach yourself, paying only when you make a sale.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you&#8217;re responsible for ecommerce strategy, channel development, or digital commerce growth.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who are you actually designing for?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Swathi Rocque from Deloitte on user-centric design, the public sector gap, and what happens when business needs override user needs]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/who-are-you-actually-designing-for</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/who-are-you-actually-designing-for</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:26:07 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195269126/da3efb45881a70bf0f2af9abfe999abf.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>User-centric design sounds obvious in theory. In practice, most digital products &#8212; and almost all government services &#8212; fall a long way short of it. Swathi Rocque, Senior Consultant at Deloitte, has worked on both sides: private sector ecommerce and public sector digital delivery, including COVID-19 response technology commissioned by the UK Government.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Swathi about the real-world tensions that shape what gets built &#8212; budget constraints, approval layers, business stakeholders who want what Gucci has without doing the research to know if it applies to their audience, and the peculiar difficulty of designing for a public sector user who has no competitors and no choice but to use what you make.</p><p>Her visa application story is the episode in miniature: a 14-page online form, ambiguous questions, no in-context help, a missed step that took two months to resolve. Nobody ran user research before they built it. The call centre cost of that decision never appeared on the same spreadsheet as the design budget.</p><p>The broader point is one that applies everywhere: if you don&#8217;t understand your product vision and your audience, you&#8217;ll build something for the wrong people, regardless of how technically well it&#8217;s done.</p><p>Worth 17 minutes if you work in digital product, UX, or any team trying to justify investment in user research.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Your mobile experience is not a smaller version of your website.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Lucy Aitken from Booking.com on why the rise of mobile demands a completely different approach to design]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/your-mobile-experience-is-not-a-smaller</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/your-mobile-experience-is-not-a-smaller</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:16:11 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195265164/3d620971dd56db2036367a97e3c746bc.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most businesses know mobile traffic matters. Fewer have genuinely rebuilt their thinking around what mobile users actually need &#8212; as opposed to just shrinking their desktop experience to fit a smaller screen.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Lucy Aitken, UI UX designer at Booking.com, who has worked across agency and client-side roles on ecommerce sites and SaaS platforms. She makes a clear and practical case for progressive enhancement: starting with the mobile experience and building up, rather than scaling down from desktop.</p><p>Her point about touch points is something most designers know but few translate into product decisions. When a user is holding a phone in one hand with a coffee in the other, the entire spatial logic of a desktop interface needs to be reconsidered. Where can their thumb reach? How large does a button need to be? Does the shopping cart even need to look the same?</p><p>She also makes a strong case for iterative change over big bang redesigns &#8212; especially for businesses with a loyal, returning customer base. People are resistant to having to relearn things they already know, even when the new version is objectively better. The touchscreen transition is a useful analogy: it took time, and some people resisted until they didn&#8217;t.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes if you work in digital product, ecommerce, or UX.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Your failed experiments are more valuable than your wins.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Luke Frake from Spotify on what a genuine experimentation culture looks like &#8212; and how to build one]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/your-failed-experiments-are-more</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/your-failed-experiments-are-more</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:37:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195264709/be986175fa99efcdccc7a0677dc3205d.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most businesses say they value data. Fewer have built the internal culture that actually lets data drive decisions. Luke Frake, experimentation and user growth lead at Spotify, has spent his career in this space &#8212; and he&#8217;s direct about what separates companies that do it well from those that just say they do.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Luke about what good experimentation culture looks like from the inside. The answer involves more than running tests. It requires a shared understanding of what learning is worth, a willingness to let failure produce something useful, and &#8212; crucially &#8212; a way of sharing results across the business that doesn&#8217;t just celebrate wins.</p><p>Spotify&#8217;s approach to this is concrete: every concluded experiment goes into a shared knowledge base, accessible to the whole company. Not just the successes. All of them. Because the failures contain the learning that eventually leads to the uplift.</p><p>Luke is also practical about how to work alongside businesses or internal teams that don&#8217;t yet have this mindset. The key is finding common ground &#8212; understanding what metrics the other team actually cares about, and explaining experimentation in those terms. Not in terms of how many tests ran, but in terms of how it helps them get where they&#8217;re trying to go.</p><p>Worth 15 minutes if you work in experimentation, optimisation, product, or any team trying to use data to make better decisions.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[China is 10 years ahead. Here's what that means for your ecommerce strategy.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Live commerce, social selling, and what the West can actually learn from Asia]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/china-is-10-years-ahead-heres-what</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/china-is-10-years-ahead-heres-what</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:32:35 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195264296/144fe2ecc9c8ee33ab98f63d4f7a0d53.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ged Zalys talks about the Chinese consumer market, he&#8217;s not describing a distant trend. He&#8217;s describing where Western ecommerce is heading &#8212; and the businesses that understand it now will have a meaningful head start.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Ged, a consultant at Accenture with hands-on experience across both European and Asian markets. He unpacks live commerce, social commerce, and the fundamental difference in how Asian platforms blur the lines between video, community, and purchasing &#8212; compared to the siloed approach most Western businesses still take.</p><p>The Snow Beer example is worth hearing alone: a brand that sold 400 million extra beverages during COVID by turning WeChat into a network of nano-influencers, each running their own micro-event for up to ten people. It&#8217;s not a gimmick. It&#8217;s a model built on understanding where people actually spend their time and what motivates them to buy.</p><p>Ged is also clear about where social commerce doesn&#8217;t belong yet &#8212; and what businesses need to have in order before they attempt it.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes if you&#8217;re responsible for growth, channel strategy, or digital commerce.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's the ROI of trust?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Ted Rubin on return on relationship &#8212; and why the brands getting it right aren't saying it, they're doing it]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/whats-the-roi-of-trust</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/whats-the-roi-of-trust</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:27:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195263947/3dab8d3ff70229af11c901d920907901.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In March 2009, Ted Rubin coined a term: Return on Relationship. He wasn&#8217;t trying to replace ROI. He was pointing at something ROI was missing &#8212; the value that accumulates over time when a brand treats the relationship with its customers like something worth nurturing, rather than a database to be monetised.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham speak with Ted, a leading social media marketing strategist, keynote speaker, and author. He is characteristically direct: if you&#8217;re only focused on the money, you risk completely overlooking the people. And if you don&#8217;t invest in those relationships, you might as well throw your marketing budget away.</p><p>His Amazon analysis is worth hearing. Amazon doesn&#8217;t run ads saying they care about customers. They just take things back, fix things, deliver on time, and make the process easy. That is the relationship. The message is in the behaviour, not the campaign.</p><p>His point about simplicity &#8212; that it&#8217;s the new everyday low pricing &#8212; reframes what convenience actually means for customers. Not just easy checkout, but easy returns, easy support, easy cancellation. If any of those moments are hard, the trust you built evaporates.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes if you work in marketing, customer experience, or any role that involves acquiring and keeping customers.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[You cannot plan to go viral. But you can plan for when things go wrong (Part 2)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Will Bonaddio on crisis management, the Adidas sports bra moment, negative comments, and what the metaverse probably won't become]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/you-cannot-plan-to-go-viral-but-you</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/you-cannot-plan-to-go-viral-but-you</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:23:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195263400/50564605bb7c32d753500aaae0c3cf85.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sequel to our first conversation with Will Bonaddio picks up where Part One left off &#8212; and gets into the harder territory: what happens when a post lands badly, when the founder does something that lands on your feed without warning, and when the crisis is real versus a storm in a very small teacup.</p><p>Will&#8217;s advice on crisis management is practical and doesn&#8217;t overclaim. Have a document. Assign levels of severity. Agree who has sign-off for which type of response. Know the difference between a tweet that went badly and a member of staff doing something genuinely damaging. And use a social listening tool to track the velocity of negative comments, not just the volume &#8212; because the spike, not the baseline, is the signal.</p><p>His analysis of the Adidas sports bra campaign &#8212; showing diverse bodies to promote a new product &#8212; is balanced and honest about where brands have to make calculated decisions about controversy. So is the KFC chicken shortage example: a crisis that was genuinely theirs to own, handled with humour because no one was actually hurt.</p><p>The section on going viral is equally clear. You can aim for remarkable content, you can increase the probability of something spreading, but you cannot manufacture virality on demand. Even with a new Avengers trailer, Disney still pays to promote it. The algorithm doesn&#8217;t owe anyone an audience.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes as the natural continuation of Part One &#8212; especially if you&#8217;re responsible for social at a brand that&#8217;s big enough to have real exposure if something goes wrong.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Working for a smaller brand is harder than working for McDonald's (Part 1)]]></title><description><![CDATA[Will Bonaddio on social strategy, organic vs paid, and why content pillars matter more than posting schedules]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/working-for-a-smaller-brand-is-harder</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/working-for-a-smaller-brand-is-harder</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:17:10 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195261793/0247ad11718167b880f80042252a7b76.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Bonaddio spent five years running social media for McDonald&#8217;s &#8212; where even your worst-performing post reaches hundreds of thousands of people, and everything gets promoted anyway. Then he joined FutureLearn. The relearning, he says, was significant.</p><p>This is the first of two episodes with Will, and it covers the fundamentals: how social strategy differs dramatically between big and small brands, why organic reach is effectively dead on Facebook and Instagram (but alive and well on LinkedIn and TikTok), and why most social media teams are measuring the wrong things.</p><p>His point about business benefit is one that should make every social media manager uncomfortable. A 2% engagement rate is meaningless if you can&#8217;t connect it to something the CEO actually cares about. That connection &#8212; between content activity and commercial outcome &#8212; is the conversation most social teams avoid. Will argues it&#8217;s the one you have to start with.</p><p>The content pillar framework he describes is practical and immediately applicable: three to five things you will always post about, used as a filter for every piece of content before it goes out. Does this post fit a pillar? If not, why are you posting it?</p><p>The 80/20 rule he advocates &#8212; 80% value-adding jabs, 20% right hook calls to action &#8212; is not new, but his framing of it from real-world brand experience at both ends of the scale makes it land differently.</p><p>Worth 16 minutes if you manage social media, commission it, or are trying to make sense of where to focus your effort and budget.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[What brands get wrong about influencers — from someone who is one.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Social media influencer and Ms Great Britain Kat Henry on authenticity, audience trust, and the reality of working with brands]]></description><link>https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/what-brands-get-wrong-about-influencers</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://experimentwitheclipse.substack.com/p/what-brands-get-wrong-about-influencers</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Hughes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:03:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/195261014/154cd3379a8f21f29d4b0ce7885d2cd3.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than half of global ecommerce leaders say influencer marketing is one of their top promotional priorities. Most of them have never spoken to an influencer about what it&#8217;s actually like on the other side.</p><p>In this episode, Shelley and Graham get that perspective from Kat Henry &#8212; established social media influencer, TikTok and Instagram creator, and current Ms Great Britain. Kat is clear-eyed about what makes influencer marketing work and what makes it fail, and she doesn&#8217;t pull punches on either side.</p><p>Her core message is one that applies far beyond influencer marketing: authenticity wins. During the pandemic, her most-engaged content was the most honest &#8212; including the post about losing her mother to COVID. The glamorous, aspirational content didn&#8217;t perform. The real stuff did. Audiences are smarter than brands give them credit for.</p><p>She&#8217;s equally direct about what she looks for in a brand partnership: shared ethos, honesty about the brief, and a product she genuinely believes in. If a product is poor, she takes the feedback to the brand privately rather than posting a damning review. That kind of integrity is rare, and it&#8217;s also what makes her audience trust her.</p><p><em>Worth 17 minutes if you&#8217;re considering influencer marketing, running a campaign, or want to understand how to select the right partner.</em></p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Give-Your-Customers-Ultimate-Experience/dp/B0BGZDVCV5/"><span>Get the Season 1 Companion on Amazon</span></a></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>